THE IMPACTS OF SPEECH ACTS TO THE EFL TEACHER AND THE STUDENTS’ ACTIVENESS IN THE TEACHING LEARNING PROCESS
DOI : 10.30863/ekspose.v22i2.5683
This research aims at identifying (1) the kinds of speech act which are performed by the teacher in Indonesian EFL classroom in terms of locutionary, illocutionary and perlocutionary, (2) The function of speech act produced by the teacher, (3) The impacts of speech act to the teacher’s and students activeness in teaching and learning process. This research employed both qualitative and quantitative method. The data were in the form of utterances spoken by the EFL teacher when teaching in the classroom. The researcher planned, collected, analyzed and reported the research findings. The steps of collecting the data were taking video of the EFL teacher when he was teaching in the classroom, transcribing what the teacher said, selecting the data, classifying the data, transferring the data into table, analyzing and interpreting the data. The findings showed that the EFL teacher commonly uses illocutionary act in his teaching. He performs mostly directives as the illocutionary acts as he often asks the students to do some works or activities. Giving instruction or command helps him to run the EFL class.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi (1) jenis tindak tutur yang dilakukan oleh guru di kelas EFL bahasa Indonesia ditinjau dari lokusi, ilokusi, dan perlokusi, (2) Fungsi tindak tutur yang dihasilkan oleh guru, (3) Dampaknya tindak tutur terhadap keaktifan guru dan siswa dalam proses belajar mengajar. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Datanya berupa ucapan yang diucapkan oleh guru EFL saat mengajar di kelas. Peneliti merencanakan, mengumpulkan, menganalisis dan melaporkan temuan penelitian. Langkah-langkah pengumpulan data adalah mengambil video guru EFL ketika dia mengajar di kelas, menyalin apa yang dikatakan guru, memilih data, mengklasifikasikan data, mentransfer data ke dalam tabel, menganalisis dan menafsirkan data. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa guru EFL umumnya menggunakan tindak ilokusi dalam pengajarannya. Ia lebih banyak melakukan arahan sebagai tindak ilokusi karena ia sering meminta siswa melakukan suatu pekerjaan atau aktivitas. Memberikan instruksi atau perintah membantunya menjalankan kelas EFL
- Al-Ghamdi, Hanaa, and Abdullah Al-Bargi. 2017. “The Impact of Teacher Speech Modification on the Quality of Interaction and Learning: An Analysis of Spoken Discourse in Saudi EFL Classrooms.” International Journal of Linguistics 9 (3): 79. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v9i3.11382.
- Chirrey, Deborah A. 2003. “‘I Hereby Come out’: What Sort of Speech Act Is Coming Out?” Journal of Sociolinguistics 7 (1): 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00209.
- Christison, MaryAnn. 2018. “Speech Act Theory and Teaching Speaking.” The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0712.
- Cohen, Andrew D., and Elite Olshtain. 1993. “The Production of Speech Acts by EFL Learners.” TESOL Quarterly 27 (1): 33. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586950.
- Cooren, François. 2000. “Toward Another Ideal Speech Situation: A Critique of Habermas’ Reinterpretation of Speech Act Theory.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 86 (3): 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630009384298.
- Dalgleish, Tim, J. Mark G.. Williams, Ann-Marie J. Golden, Nicola Perkins, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Phillip J. Barnard, Cecilia Au Yeung, et al. 2007. “[ No Title ].” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136 (1): 23–42.
- Flowerdew, John. 1990. “Problems of Speech Act Theory From.” Language Learning, no. March: 79–105.
- Furuyama, Nobuhiro. 2002. “Prolegomena of a Theory of between-Person Coordination of Speech and Gesture.” International Journal of Human Computer Studies 57 (4): 347–74. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2002.1021.
- Gheisari, Nouzar. 2017. “Private Speech in Teacher-Learner Interactions in an EFL Context : A Sociocultural Perspective.” Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 5 (July): 53–74.
- Graca, Thomas J., and David L. Stader. 2007. “Student Speech and the Internet: A Legal Analysis.” NASSP Bulletin 91 (2): 121–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636507301943.
- Green, Mitchell. 2015. “Speech Acts.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
- Green, Mitchell S. 2009. “Speech Acts, the Handicap Principle and the Expression of Psychological States.” Mind and Language 24 (2): 139–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2008.01357.x.
- Hitotuzi, Nilton. 2005. “Teacher Talking Time in the EFL Classroom T Iempo de Participación Oral Del Pr Ofesor En El Aula de Inglés Como Lengua E Xtranjera Profesor Extranjera.” Teachers’ Professional Development 6 (1): 97–106.
- Janson, Marius A, and Carson C Woo. n.d. “Speech Act Theoy in Information Systems,” no. 1988.
- Kaburise, Phyllis. 2011. Speech Act Theory and and Communication.
- Kang, M., and T. Im. 2013. “Factors of Learner-Instructor Interaction Which Predict Perceived Learning Outcomes in Online Learning Environment.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 29 (3): 292–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12005.
- Katula, Richard A. 1986. “Excellence in the Speech Communication Classroom.” Communication Quarterly 34 (4): 341–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378609369646.
- KOIKE, DALE APRIL. 1989. “Pragmatic Competence and Adult L2 Acquisition: Speech Acts in Interlanguage.” The Modern Language Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb06364.x.
- Marton, Ference, and Shirley Booth. 2000. “The Learner ’ S Experience of Learning,” 513–41.
- Merdana. 2013. “And Analysis of Speech Acts Produced by Elementary School Teachers and Students to Facilitate Teaching and Learning at Sdn 10 Pringgasela East Lombok.” E-Journal Pasca Sarjana Undiksha 1, 2013. 1 (1969).
- Ren, Juanjuan, and Xiaofang Gao. 2012. “Negative Pragmatic Transfer in Chinese Students’ Complimentary Speech Acts.” Psychological Reports 110 (1): 149–65. https://doi.org/10.2466/07.17.21.28.PR0.110.1.149-165.
- Searle, John, and I Introduction. 2013. “AUCKLAND 2013 Influence of SF 6 Decomposition on the Dielectric Performance of Equipment Containing Liquefied SF 6 at Low Temperatures E . KYNAST *; K . JUHRE SUMMARY,” 1–16.
- “THE GRAPH FRI FRAMEWORK- SPLINE WAVELET THEORY AND SAMPLING ON CIRCULANT GRAPHS Madeleine S . Kotzagiannidis and Pier Luigi Dragotti Communications and Signal Processing Group ( CSP ), Imperial College London , UK.” 2016, 6375–79.
- Yeo, Geoffrey. 2010. “Representing the Act: Records and Speech Act Theory.” Journal of the Society of Archivists 31 (2): 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379816.2010.506782.
- Zayed, Niveen Mohammad. 2014. “Jordanian EFL Teachers ’ and Students ’ Practice of Speech Acts in the Classroom.” International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL) 2 (5): 1–10.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.