Validitas Instrumen Kompetensi Profesional pada Penilaian Prestasi Kerja Guru
DOI : 10.30863/ekspose.v18i2.529
The purpose of this research is to examine professional competency instrument validity on the assessment of teacher work performance based on the analysis of Aiken's V and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The assessment of teacher work performance is the assessment of work result achieved by a teacher in organizational units in accordance with work goals and teacher work attitude. The type of this research is a quantitative descriptive where the researcher collect the data/information as much as possible about teacher work performance through teacher professional competency. The data that have been collected are used to set the assessment of teacher work performance instrument in terms of professional competency. Data collection techniques in this research used test instrument. Data analysis techniques in this research through:1) the research of expert judgment that is considered capable by paying attention to material, construction, language used in the item and then continued using the Aiken's V formula; 2) factor analysis that serves to summarize or reduce observation variables become new dimensions that present the main variable (factor). The conclusions in this research, namely: 1) the results of testing the validity of Aiken's V content of 0.75 in the professional competence instrument, this indicates that the instrument can be used because it has been fulfilled substantially, construction, and language aspects; 2) the validity test result by confirmatory factor analysis shows that the 16 items on professional competency can be used to assess teacher work performance.
Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menguji validitas instrumen kompetensi profesional pada penilaian prestasi kerja guru berdasarkan analisis Aiken’s V dan confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Penilaian prestasi kerja guru merupakan penilaian hasil kerja yang dicapai oleh seorang guru pada satuan organisasi sesuai dengan sasaran kerja dan perilaku kerja guru. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kuntitatif dimana peneliti menggali dan mengumpulkan data/informasi sebanyak-banyaknya tentang prestasi kerja guru melalui kompetensi profesional guru. Data yang telah terkumpul selanjutnya digunakan untuk menyusun instrumen penilaian prestasi kerja guru ditinjau dari kompetensi profesional. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan instrumen tes. Teknik analisis data pada penelitian ini melalui: 1) telaah expert judgment yang dianggap mampu dengan memperhatikan: materi, konstruksi, dan bahasa yang digunakan dalam butir soal dan selanjunya diteruskan menggunakan formula Aiken’s V dan 2) analisis faktor yang berfungsi untuk meringkas atau mereduksi variabel-variabel pengamatan menjadi bentuk dimensi baru yang mempresentasikan variabel utama (faktor). Kesimpulan dalam penelitian ini, yaitu: 1) hasil pengujian validitas isi Aiken’s V sebesar 0.75 pada intrumen kompetensi profesional, hal ini menunjukkan instrumen dapat digunakan karena telah terpenuhi secara subtansial, kontruksi, dan aspek bahasanya dan 2) hasil pengujian validitas secara analisis confirmatory factor analysis menunjukkan bahwa ke 16 butir pada kompetensi profesional dapat digunakan untuk menilai prestasi kerja guru.
- Allen, Mary J, and Wendy M Yen. Introduction to Measurement Theory. Waveland Press, 2001.
- Anggara, Rian, and Umi Chotimah. “Penerapan Lesson Study Berbasis Musyawarah Guru Mata Pelajaran (MGMP) Terhadap Peningkatan Kompetensi Profesional Guru PKN SMP Se-Kabupaten Ogan Ilir.” In Jurnal Forum Sosial, 5:107–203. Jurusan Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu …, 2012.
- Aritonang, Keke T. “Kompensasi Kerja, Disiplin Kerja Guru Dan Kinerja Guru SMP Kristen BPK Penabur Jakarta.” Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur 4, no. 4 (2005): 1–16.
- Azwar, Saifuddin. Reliabilitas Dan Validitas. Pustaka Pelajar. 4th ed. Yogyakarta, 2012.
- Ballantyne, Roy, Robert Thompson, and Peter Taylor. “Principals’ Conceptions of Competent Beginning Teachers.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 26, no. 1 (1998): 51–64.
- Deakin-crick, Ruth. “Pedagogy for Citizenship.” In Getting Involved, 31–55. Brill Sense, 2008.
- Johnson, Robert L, James A Penny, and Belita Gordon. Assessing Performance: Designing, Scoring, and Validating Performance Tasks. Guilford Press, 2008.
- Jöreskog, Karl G, and Dag Sörbom. LISREL 8.80. Scientific Software International. Chicago, 2006.
- Kartowagiran, Badrun. “Kinerja Guru Profesional (Guru Pasca Sertifikasi).” Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan 3, no. 3 (2011).
- Kusaeri, Kusaeri, and Suprananto Suprananto. Pengukuran Dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Graha Ilmu. Yogyakarta, 2012.
- Long, Joyce Fleck, and Anita Woolfolk Hoy. “Interested Instructors: A Composite Portrait of Individual Differences and Effectiveness.” Teaching and Teacher Education 22, no. 3 (2006): 303–14.
- Matondang, Zulkifli. “Validitas Dan Reliabilitas Suatu Instrumen Penelitian.” Jurnal Tabularasa 6, no. 1 (2009): 87–97.
- Nasional, Departemen Pendidikan. Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005, Tentang Guru dan Dosen, Depdiknas § (2005).
- Nunnally, Jum C. “Psychometric Theory—25 Years Ago and Now.” Educational Researcher 4, no. 10 (1975): 7–21.
- Purnomo, Yoppy Wahyu. “A Scale for Measuring Teachers’ Mathematics-Related Beliefs: A Validity and Reliability Study.” International Journal of Instruction 10, no. 2 (2017): 23–38.
- Ramadani, Marina, Supahar Supahar, and Dadan Rosana. “Validity of Evaluation Instrument on the Implementation of Performance Assessment to Measure Science Process Skills.” Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA 3, no. 2 (2017): 180–88.
- Rangkuti, Annisa Fitri, and Filia Dina Anggaraeni. “Hubungan Persepsi Tentang Kompetensi Profesional Guru Matematika Dengan Motivasi Belajar Matematika Pada Siswa SMA,” 2005.
- Retnawati, Heri. Validitas Reliabilitas Dan Karakteristik Butir. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing, 2016.
- Saptono, Ari. “Development Instruments through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) in Appropriate Intensity Assessment.” Dinamika Pendidikan 12, no. 1 (2017): 13–19.
- Supahar, Supahar. “Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Penyusunan Laporan Praktikum Fisika SMP Berbasis Inkuiri.” Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains 3, no. 1 (2015): 23–29.
- Timperley, Helen, Aaron Wilson, Heather Barrar, and Irene Fung. “Teacher Professional Learning and Development.” International Adacemy of Education, 2008.
- Wilkerson, Judy R, and William Steve Lang. Assessing Teacher Competency: Five Standards-Based Steps to Valid Measurement Using the CAATS Model. Corwin Press, 2007.
- Yadiannur, Mitra. “Mobile Learning Based Worked Example in Electric Circuit (WEIEC) Application to Improve the High School Students’ Electric Circuits Interpretation Ability.” International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 12, no. 3 (2017): 539–58.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.