KARAKTERISTIK BUTIR SOAL: CLASSICAL TEST THEORY VS ITEM RESPONSE THEORY?

Muh Syahrul Sarea* -  Fakultas Tarbiyah, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Bone, Indonesia
Rosnia Ruslan -  Dinas Pendidikan Kab. Banjar, Indonesia

DOI : 10.30863/didaktika.v13i1.296

This research aimes to describe the characteristic of UAS items theme 1 at the fourth grade of Primary School in Paramasan bawah village according to the item difficulties and discrimination. The sample of this research was 37 students who took the final examination year academic 2018/2019. The objects of this research were question items and the answer sheet of the final exam that obtained from 3 different schools in Paramasan Bawah village. The data analysis technique used in this research was empirical analysis helped by Bilog  and Iteman program application. This analysis used to know the characteristic of items based on the Item Response Theory and Classical Test Theory. The result of this research showed the characteristic of UAS items, according to item response theory, 30 items had a good discrimination and 33 items had a good item difficulty, while according to Classical Test Theory: 15 items had a good discrimination and 27 items had a good item difficulty.

Keywords: Characteristics of items, item difficulties, discrimination

  1. DAFTAR PUSTAKA
  2. Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Inc.[Context Link].
  3. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Sage.
  4. Herlant, Y., & Nopithalia, N. (2007). Meneropong kualitas soal tes buatan guru biologi MTs Negeri se-Jakarta Selatan. Meneropong Kualitas Soal Tes Buatan Guru Biologi Mts Negeri Se-Jakarta Selatan.
  5. Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran penilaian dan evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.
  6. Naga, D. S. (1992). Pengantar teori sekor pada pengukuran pendidikan. Jakarta: Gunadarma.
  7. Reckase, M. D. (2009). Multidimensional item response theory models. In Multidimensional item response theory (pp. 79–112). Springer.
  8. Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori respons butir dan penerapannya: Untuk peneliti, praktisi pengukuran dan pengujian, mahasiswa pascasarjana. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.
  9. Saifuddin, A. (2002). TES PRESTASI fungsi dan pengembangan pengukuran prestasi belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset.
  10. Sarea, M. S., & Hadi, S. (2015). Analisis Kualitas Soal Ujian Akhir Semester Mata Pelajaran Kimia SMA di Kabupaten Gowa. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 3(1), 35–43.
  11. Schulz, W., & Fraillon, J. (2011). The analysis of measurement equivalence in international studies using the Rasch model. Educational Research and Evaluation, 17(6), 447–464.
  12. Widoyoko, E. P. (2012). Teknik penyusunan instrumen penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 15, 22.
  13. Wirawan, E. T., & Model, S. (2011). Aplikasi dan Profesi. Jakarta: Raja Grapindo Persada.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2019-07-12
Published: 2019-08-15
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: 89 109