AN ANALYSIS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROSECUTOR'S REGULATION NUMBER 15 OF 2020 CONCERNING TERMINATION OF PROSECUTIONS BASED ON RESTORATIVE JUSTICE AGAINST THE ABUSIVE CRIMINAL ACT

Muammar Muammar* -  IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia
M. Irham Roihan -  Kejaksaan Negeri Tojo Una-Una, Indonesia

DOI : 10.30863/jad.v4i2.1842

The termination of prosecution in Erna Wilis’s case with Case Register Number PDM-44.SPEM/Eoh.2/07/2020 at the West Pasaman District Attorney Office, the author analyzes the basic considerations of the Public Prosecutor in implementing Restorative Justice, the suitability of the termination of the prosecution with the Prosecutor's Regulation (PERJA) Number 15 of 2020 concerning the termination of prosecution based on restorative justice and the obstacles faced by the Public Prosecutor. The research uses empirical juridical research methods with analytical descriptive studies using primary and secondary data. From the results of the analysis, it was concluded that the consideration of the Public Prosecutor was to apply Restorative Justice based on Article 14 of the Criminal Procedure Code letter h. Article 140 paragraph (2) letter a of the Criminal Procedure Code and Article 3 paragraph (2) letter e of PERJA Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice. The termination of prosecution is in accordance with PERJA Number 15 of 2020 substantively and the obstacles faced lie in the suitability of the timing of the termination of prosecution based on restorative justice.

Keywords
Restorative Justice, Criminal Law
  1. Peraturan Perundang-Undangan:
  2. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) Dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.
  3. “Peraturan Kejaksaan RI Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif,” 2020.
  4. Buku:
  5. Afif, Afthonul. “Pemaafan, Rekonsiliasi Dan Restorative Justice.” Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta, 2015.
  6. Ali, Achmad. Achmad Ali, Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) Dan Teori Peradilan (Judicial Prudence),(Jakarta: Prenamedia Group), 2015, h. 294. Jakarta: Prenamedia Group, 2015.
  7. Ali, H Z. Hukum Pidana Islam. Sinar Grafika, 2007. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=uCh9NQAACAAJ.
  8. Andi, Hamzah. “Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana.” Rineka Cipta, Jakarta, 2008.
  9. Friedman, Lawrence M. The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. Russell Sage Foundation, 1975.
  10. Johnstone, Gerry, and Daniel W Van Ness. “The Meaning of Restorative Justice.” In Handbook of Restorative Justice, 27–45. Willan, 2013.
  11. Leden, Marpaung. “Tindak Pidana Terhadap Nyawa Dan Tubuh (Pemberantasan Prevensinya).” Jakarta, Sinar Grafika, 2002.
  12. PAF, Lamintang, and Theo Lamintang. “Kejahatan Terhadap Nyawa, Tubuh, Dan Kesehatan.” Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2012.
  13. Soekanto, Soerjono. “Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat,” 2007.
  14. Srachman, R M, and Andi Hamzah. “Jaksa Di Berbagai Negara: Peranan Dan Kedudukannya,” 1997.
  15. Sunggono, Bambang. “Metode Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta.” PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.
  16. Yulia, Rena. Viktimologi: Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kejahatan. Graha Ilmu, 2010.
  17. Zulfa, Eva Achjani. “Keadilan Restoratif.” Depok: Badan Penerbit FHUI, 2009.
  18. Jurnal:
  19. Anugrah, Triandy. “Tinjauan Yuridis TerhadapnTindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Mengakibatkan Luka Berat.” Universias hasanuddin, 2016.
  20. Aries, Albert. “Penyelesaian Perkara Pencurian Ringan Dan Restorative Justice.” Varia Peradilan 247 (2006): h.3.
  21. Herlina, Apong. “Restorative Justice.” Indonesian Journal of Criminology 3, no. 3 (2004): 4244.
  22. Marlina, Marlina, and Restorative Justice Sebagai Alternatif Perlindungan Terhadap. “Pengantar Konsep Diversi Dan Restorative Justice Dalam Hukum Pidana.” Medan: USU Press, 2010.
  23. Prayitno, KuatPuji. “Restorative Justice Untuk Peradilan Di Indonesia (Perspektif Yuridis Filosofis Dalam Penegakan Hukum In Concreto).” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 12, no. 3 (2012): 407–20.
  24. Putra, Surya Desismansyah Eka. “Bingkai Keadilan Hukum Pancasila Dalam Perspektif Hukum Dan Relevansinya Dengan Keadilan Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan 27, no. 1 (2016).
  25. Saputra, Ferdy, Syafrddin Kalo, Mahmud Mulyadi, and Muhammd Hamdan. “Analisis Yuridis Penerbitan Surat Perintah Penghentian Penuntutan Oleh Kejaksaan Dikaitkan Dengan Asas Oportunitas Dan Undang-Undang No 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan RI.” USU Law Journal 2, no. 1 (2014): 105–23.
  26. Satria, Hariman. “Restorative Justice: Paradigma Baru Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal Media Hukum 25, no. 1 (2018): 111–23.
  27. Tampoli, Daniel Ch M. “Penghentian Penuntutan Perkara Pidana Oleh Jaksa Berdasarkan Hukum Acara Pidana.” Lex Privatum 4, no. 2 (2016).
  28. Sumber lain:
  29. Ali. “Menafsirkan Rumusan ‘Demi Kepentingan Hukum’ Dalam KUHAP.” Hukum Online, n.d. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt4b1dea37d8cd8/menafsirkan-rumusan-demi-kepentingan-hukum-dalam-kuhap/.
  30. Badan pendidikan dan Pelatihan Kejaksaan RI. “Modul Tindak Dalam KUHPPidana Tertentu.” Jakarta, 2020.
  31. Kejaksaan, RI. “Laporan Keadilan Restoratif Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Tahun 2020,” 2020.
  32. Muhammad, Ridlo. “Belajar Dari Kasus Nenek Minah Pencuri Kakao,” 2017. https://www.liputan6.com/regional/read/3203697/belajar-dari-kasus-nenek-minah-pencuri-kakao.
  33. RI, Kejaksaan. “Konferensi Pers Capaian Kinerja 1 (Satu) Tahun Jaksa Agung RI,” n.d. https://www.kejaksaan.go.id/siaranpers.php?idu=0&id=2399.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2021-10-06
Published: 2021-12-01
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 246 249
In Vol 4, No 2 (2021)