LAW ENFORCEMENT ON THE INHERITANCE OF SIRI MARRIED IN THE JUDICIAL VERDICT

Rusli Rusli* -  Pengadilan Agama Limboto, Indonesia
Nur Mohamad Kasim -  Lecturer at State University of Gorontalo, Indonesia
Duke Arie Widagdo -  Lecturer at State University of Gorontalo, Indonesia

DOI : 10.35673/al-bayyinah.v4i2.756

Siri marriage is an interesting issue to be discussed in various perspectives. The legal consequences of unmarried marriage need clarity, especially in terms of inheritance rights. The law Number 1 of 1974 concerning marriage has required that marriages be recorded, as a form of legality recognized by the State. But on the other hand, the Marriage Law has provided absolute freedom to get married in accordance with the provisions of their respective religions. In various legal products, through law enforcement in the judiciary, it creates many perspectives, resulting in multiple interpretations in the position of the right of inheritance in siri marriage. This research, more specifically, examines law enforcement against siri marriage by examining judicial verdicts. The research approach focuses more on normative law by focusing on the study of legal norms, in producing new arguments, theories or concepts. The research data were collected through a library review and legal opinion. The findings of this study indicate that law enforcement of the inheritance rights of siri marriage gets a portion of the inheritance by substantially considering the aspects of justice. Judicial decisions consider aspects of legal benefit to the rights arising from unmarried marriage. The implication of this finding is that the marriage law is urgent to be amended, the occurrence of multiple interpretations of legal marriage becomes a gap in the implementation of unregistered marriage.

Keywords: Law Enforcement, Siri Marriage, Judge’s Verdicts.

  1. Amanat, Anasitus. Membagi warisan Berdasarkan Pasal-Pasal Hukum Perdata BW. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2001.
  2. Assiddiqie, Jimly and M. Ali Safa’at. Teori Hans Kelsen tentang Hukum. 5th Ed.; Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2018.
  3. Basyir, Ahmad Azhar. Hukum Waris Islam. 14th Ed.; Yogyakarta: UII Press Yogyakarta, 2001.
  4. _______Hukum Waris Islam. Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia, 1990.
  5. Civil Code (KUHPerdata)
  6. Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia 1945
  7. Doi, Rahman I. Penjelasan Lengkap Hukum-hukum Allah (Syariah. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2002.
  8. Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia: Himpunan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Lingkungan Peradilan AgamaTahun 2014.
  9. Dauly, Sayuruddin. Pencatatan Perkawinan Dalam Persfektif Hukum Islam dan Pollitik Nasional, (Tinjauan Normatif terhadap Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010). IKAHI: Majalah Hukum Varia Peradilan, Tahun XXXI Number 369 Agustus 2016.
  10. Dworkin, Ronald. Sovereign Virtue, The Theory And Practice Of Equality. Harvard University Press, 2000.
  11. Fuady, Munir. Konsep Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2014.
  12. Huda, Ni’matul. Teori dan Hukum Konstitusi. Third Ed.; Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2003.
  13. Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage
  14. Muhibbin, Mohammad dan Abdul Wahid. Hukum Kewarisan Islam (Sebagai Prmbaharuan Hukum Positif di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2009.
  15. Pagar. Himpunan Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Cet. I; Medan: Perdana Publishing, 2010.
  16. Perangin, Effendi. Hukum Waris. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada, 2013.
  17. _______Hukum Waris. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 1997.
  18. Presidential Instruction Number 1 of 1991 concerning Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI).
  19. Rawls, John. A Theory Of Justice Revised Edition. The Belknap Press Of Harvard University Press, 1999.
  20. Rawls, Joh. Distributive justice: Some addenda. In Natural Law Forum. Vol. 13, Number 1, Oxford University Press, 1968.
  21. Sabiq, Sayyid. Fiqh Sunnah Jilid 5. Fifth Ed.; Jakarta: Pena Pundi Aksara, 2013.
  22. As-Shiddiqi, Teungku Muhammad Hasbi. Fiqih Mawaris. Semarang: Pustaka Rizki Putra, 2001.
  23. Salim HS. Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis (BW). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2002.
  24. Tobroni, Faiq. Penafsiran Hukum Dekonstruksi untuk pelanggaran Poligami. Komisi
  25. Usman, Rachmadi. Hukum Kewarisan Islam dalam Dimensi Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Bandung: CV Mandar Maju, 2009.
  26. Voorthuis, Jocob and Cyrille Gijbels. A Fair Accord: Cradle to Cradle as a Design Theory Measured against John Rawls’ Theory of Justice and Immanuel Kant’s Categorical Imperative. Sustainability, 2(1), 2010.
  27. Wantu, Fence M. Antinomi dalam Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakim. Jurnal Berkala Mimbar Hukum. Vol. 19 Number 3 October, Yogyakarta: Faculty of Law Gajah Mada University, 2007.
  28. Yudisial Republik Indonesia: Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 9. Number 3 December 2016.
  29. Yulia. Dampak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Number 46 PUU-VIII/2010 Tentang Keabsahan Status Anak di Luar Nikah Perspektif Hukum Perdata Islam. Jurnal Al-Bayyinah Vol. VII Number 1. IAIN Bone, 2017.
  30. Zamzami, Mukhtar. Perempuan dan Keadilan Dalam Hukum Kewarisan Indonesia. First Ed., Jakarta: Kencana, 2013.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2020-06-06
Published: 2020-08-27
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 322 513
In Vol 4, No 2 (2020)