Criminal Sanctions as the Answer of the Vaccum in Adminstrative Law Enforcement

Jennifer Jennifer* -  Universitas Surabaya, Indonesia
Anastasia Maria Gabriela -  Universitas Surabaya, Indonesia
Kezia Linardi -  Universitas Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI : 10.35673/al-bayyinah.v6i2.2848

Administrative sanctions are considered not sufficient to meet the legal needs of state administration so that they require assistance with criminal sanctions in law enforcement. However, the clarity regarding the transition in the use of administrative sanctions to criminal sanctions has not been regulated with clear boundaries. The varied and subjective implementation certainly causes injustice and legal uncertainty for the community, especially those who receive sanctions. This study uses a juridical normative approach. This paper explains the role of criminal sanctions to fill the legal vacuum that cannot be provided by administrative sanctions, causing the importance of the existence of criminal sanctions in every administrative law. This paper also finds that there is no legal certainty to regulate the structure of the use of sanctions in administrative law. The urgency of the formation of rules that meet the structure, substance, and clear legal culture in its implementation will provide legal certainty and justice in the enforcement of state administrative law.
Keywords
Administrative; Criminal Law; Criminal Sanction.
  1. Buana, Mirza Satria. Hubungan Tarik-Menarik Antara Asas Kepastian Hukum (Legal Certainpi) Dengan Asas Keadilan (Substantial Justice) Dalam Putusan-Putusan Mahkamah Konstltusi. Yogyakarta: Tesis Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia (2010), p. 34
  2. Friedman, Lawrence M. Hukum Amerika: Sebuah Pengantar, Translated from American Law An Introduction, 2nd Edition, Translated by Wisnu Basuki, Jakarta: Tatanusa, 2001.
  3. Gilchrist, G.M. Individual Accountability For Corporate Crime. Georgia State University ( 2021).
  4. Herlina, Nina. Penerapan Sanksi Administrasi Dalam Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justici, Vol.7 No.2 (2019).
  5. Hamzah, Andi. Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan, Sinar Grafika: Jakarta, 2008.
  6. Idlir, Peci. Sounds of Silence: A Research Into the Relationship Between Administrative Supervision, Criminal Investigation and the Nemo-Tenetur Principle: Wolf Legal Publisher, Nijmegen, 2016.
  7. Julyano, Mario, Aditya Yuli Sulistyawan. Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum. Jurnal Crepido, Vol. 01 No. 01, (2019), p.13-22
  8. Maroni. Pengantar Hukum Pidana Administrasi, CV. Anugrah Utama Raharja (AURA): Bandar Lampung, 2015.
  9. Muchtar, Masrudi. Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Bidang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup, Prestasi Pustaka: Jakarta, 2015.
  10. Murniati, F. Kebijakan Formulasi Hukum Pidana Administrasi Dalam Bidang Kesehatan di Indonesia, Tesis, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang, 2007.
  11. Mongabay, “Catatan Awal Tahun: Berbagai Persoalan dalam Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Hidup”, https://www.mongabay.co.id/2022/01/10/catatan-awal-tahun-berbagai-persoalan-dalam-penegakan-hukum-lingkungan-hidup/ accessed on 12 June 2022.
  12. Naiboho,N, Harkrisnowo, H., Suhariyono AR., Wibisana, AG. Criministrative Law: Developmentsand Challenges In Indonesia, Indonesia Law Review, Volume 11, No.1 (2021)
  13. Prayogo, R. Tony. Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 Tentang Hak Uji Materiil Dan Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 06/Pmk/2005 Tentang Pedoman Beracara Dalam Pengujian Undang-Undang . Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. 13 No. 2, (2016) p.194
  14. Puspita, L. Optimalisasi Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Bidang Lingkungan Hidup Melalui Prinsip Primum Remedium. (2018)
  15. Ridwan, HR. Hukum Administrasi Negara, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada: Jakarta, 2006.
  16. Rahayu, Derita Prapti, Faisal, Yokotani, Rafiqa Sari, Ndaru Satrio. Law Enforcement in the Context of Legal Culture in Society. Law Reform, Vol. 16 No.2, (2020), p.276-289.
  17. Rangkuti, Sri Sundari. Hukum Lingkungan dan Kebijaksanaan Lingkungan Nasional. Airlangga University Pers, 2000.
  18. Ranidajita, T.H. Eksistensi Sanksi Pidana Dalam Hukum Administrasi Negara Khususnya Hukum Pajak di Indonesia, Dalam : Masalah-Masalah Hukum. 1994.
  19. Rizal, Y., Fakrulloh, ZA. Application of Ultimum Remedium Principle in Tax Criminal Law in MIC, EAI, 2021.
  20. Soekanto, Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Rajawali: Jakarta, 2003.
  21. Sumardjono, Maria S.W. Kepastian Hukum dalam Pendaftaran Tanah dan Manfaatnya Bagi Bisnis Perbankan dan Properti, in Seminar Kebijaksanaan Baru Di Bidang Pertanahan, Dampak Dan Peluang Bagi Bisnis Properti Dan Perbankan, Jakarta, 6 Agustus 1997, p. 1
  22. Susanto, Sri Nur Hari. Karakter Yuridis Sanksi Hukum Administrasi: Suatu Pendekat Komparasi. Adminitrative Law & Governance Journal. Vol. 2 Issue 1 (2019).
  23. Widayati, Lidya Suryani. Ultimum Remedium dalam Bidang Lingkungan Hidup. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, Vol. 22, No. 1 (2015).

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2022-06-20
Published: 2022-07-18
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 310 210
In Vol 6, No 2 (2022): Al-Bayyinah