Sole Candidate in the Local Leader Election and Its Implications on the Supervision of the Democratic Process in Indonesia

Vivin Sanjaya -  Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam, IAIN Bone, Indonesia, Indonesia
Imron Rizki A* -  State Institute of Islamic Studies of Bone, Indonesia

DOI : 10.35673/al-bayyinah.v5i1.1269

The sole candidate in the local leader election has become a phenomenon in the world of democracy in Indonesia. The sole candidate in the local leader election in Indonesia, is considered a solution to the impasse of democracy since 2015. This phenomenon has become a solution as well as a polemic in the community, because it is full of monopoly power. This study examines the implementation of a sole candidate in the local leader election in Bone Regency and its implications on the democratic process. This research is classified as field research with qualitative methods, while the approach used is descriptive analytic. The data sources of this research are based on primary data and secondary data. Primary data were taken from the results of interviews and observations. The results of this study indicate that the practice of selecting a sole candidate (choosing an empty column) in Bone Regency is not in the same breath as democracy and reduces the interests of the people's sovereignty in electing a leader. Some of the implications that arise include: a monopoly on political parties, injuring the interests of local communities, sole candidate competition which results in harassment and complications of pressure on voters who campaign for empty columns. As a result, people feel that their rights are not taken into account in the local leader election. The implication of this finding is that in responding to the practice of selecting sole candidates as in Bone Regency, there are many problems, so the sole candidate competition must be ended immediately because it is not in tune with the philosophical meaning of democracy.
Keywords
Sole candidate; the local leader election; supervision; democracy
  1. Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
  2. Al-Arif, Muhammad Yasin. "Politik Hukum Calon Tunggal Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Impliksasinya Terhadap Sistem Pilkada Serentak." Jurnal Yuridis 3.2 (2017): 98-114.
  3. Bachmid, Fahri. "Eksistensi Kedaulatan Rakyat dan Implementasi Parliamentary Threshold dalam Sistem Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia." SIGn Journal of Law (SIGn Jurnal Hukum) 2.2 (2021): 87-103.
  4. Fahmi, Khairul. "Prinsip Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Penentuan Sistem Pemilihan Umum Anggota Legislatif." Jurnal Konstitusi 7.3 (2016): 119-160.
  5. Fajar.co.id. Dilapor KPU Bone ke Polisi, Paslon Perseorangan Tak Takut, See: https://fajar.co.id/2018/01/30/dilapor-kpu-bone-ke-polisi-paslon-perseorangan-tak-takut/ , accessed on May 30, 2020 at 02.31 PM.
  6. Harahap, Dessy Agustina. "Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Pelaksana Pengawasan Pilkada Berdasarkan Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2015 dalam Mewujudkan Demokrasi di Daerah." JURNAL MERCATORIA 10.1 (2017): 10-17.
  7. Harjono. Transformasi Demokrasi, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jakarta: 2009.
  8. Huda, Ni’matul. Dinamika Ketatanegaraan Indonesia dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press, 2011.
  9. Indra, Mexsasai. "Konsepsi Kedaulatan Rakyat dalam Cita Hukum Pancasila." Jurnal Selat 1.2 (2014): 120-126.
  10. Law Number 10 of 2016 Second Amendment to Law Number 1 of 2015 concerning the election of Governors, Regents, and Mayors.
  11. Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections.
  12. Lutfi, Mustafa. Hukum Sengketa Pemilukada di Indonesia, Gagasan Perluasan Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Yogyakarta: UII Press, 2010.
  13. Rahman, Faiz, and Dian Agung Wicaksono. "Eksistensi dan Karakteristik Putusan Bersyarat Mahkamah Konstitusi." Jurnal Konstitusi 13.2 (2016): 348-378.
  14. Rajab, Achmadudin. "Tinjauan Hukum Eksistensi dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2015 Setelah 25 Kali Pengujian Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi pada Tahun 2015." Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 46.03 (2016).
  15. Rakyatku, “Diduga Edarkan Brosur Kotak Kosong, Pemuda di Bone Diamankan” http://pilkada.rakyatku.com/read/107264/2018/06/26/diduga-edarkan-brosur-kotak-kosong-pemuda-di-bone-diamankan , accessed on May 29, 2020, at 02.00 PM.
  16. RS, Iza Rumesten. "Fenomena Calon Tunggal dalam Pesta Demokrasi." Jurnal Konstitusi 13.1 (2016): 72-94.
  17. Rukoyah, Rukoyah, and Marno Wance. "Calon Tunggal Pada Pemilihan Kepala Desa di Kecamatan Kemiri Kabupaten Purwerejo." Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian 1.9 (2021): 1941-1954.
  18. Sindonews.com, Lapor ke DKPP, Umar-Madeng Sebut KPU Bone Langgar Aturan Pilkada, See: https://makassar.sindonews.com/berita/7109/1/lapor-ke-dkpp-umar-madeng-sebut-kpu-bone-langgar-aturan-pilkada , accessed on May 30, 2020, at 02.39 PM.
  19. Syafei, Mohammad. Tinjauan Atas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No: 100/puu-xiii/2015 Tentang Calon Tunggal dalam Pemilihan Kepala Daerah dan Wakil Kepala Daerah. Diss. Tadulako University.
  20. Syahrudin, Riko, Mexsasai Indra, and Junaidi Junaidi. ANALISIS YURIDIS CALON TUNGGAL dalam PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH di INDONESIA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 100/PUU-XIII/2015 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2015 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 Tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pemilihan Gubernur, Bupati, dan Walikota Menjadi Undang-Undang). Diss. Riau University, 2016.

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2021-02-20
Published: 2021-08-05
Section: Articles
Article Statistics: 343 209