Conflict Between Hizb Ut-Tahrir And Islamic Civil Society In Indonesia:A Countermovement Approach

Hasbi Aswar* -  Department of Political Science, Kulliyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University of Malaysia; International Relations Department, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta.
Danial Bin Mohd. Yusof -  International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization, International Islamic University of Malaysia. Persiaran Tuanku Syed Sirajuddin, Bukit Tunku, 50480 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Malaysia
Rohana Binti Abdul Hamid -  Department of Political Science, Kulliyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University of Malaysia, Jalan Gombak, 53100, Selangor, Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI : 10.35673/ajmpi.v5i2.892

In a social movement study, countermovement emerges when certain movement is considered to bring threat to the status quo or the current political and social condition. Social movement seeks for changing the existing situation while the countermovement pursues to keep it. As a result, the conflict between two becomes inevitable, where both will compete to win over the other. The existence of Hizb ut-Tahrir in Indonesia (HTI) for years is responded by some Islamic groups especially Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) and its allies, as threat to the Indonesian life due to the idea brought by HTI. It becomes the root of conflict between HTI and other Islamic groups in Indonesia. This article aims to explain the conflict between HTI and other Islamic groups by elaborating the effort of the Islamic groups to counter the HTI narratives and mobilization by using countermovement approach in social movement studies. This article is a case study research and using mainly secondary data to analyze the issue. This article found that Nahdlatul Ulama as the main countermovement played significant role to counter Hizb ut-Tahrir`s religious and political narratives as well as its political mobilization.

Keywords
Countermovement; Hizb ut-Tahrir Indonesia; Nahdlatul Ulama; Social Movement
  1. Al-Amin, Ainur Rofiq. 2012. Membongkar Proyek Khilafah Ala Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia. Yogyakarta: LKIS Yogyakarta.
  2. Alawi, Abdullah. 2017. “Ormas-Ormas Islam Indonesia Dukung Pemerintah Bubarkan HTI.” Nu Online. 2017.
  3. Amir, Irfan. 2020. “An Analysis Of Jokowi ’ S Policy In Refusing The Return Of Former ISIS Foreign Terrorist Fighters Indonesia Citizens.” Al-Bayyinah : Jurnal of Islamic Law 4 (1): 118–32. https://doi.org/10.35673/al-bayyinah.v3i2.492.
  4. Aswar, Hasbi. 2015. “Organisasi Nadhlatul Ulama Memerangi Radikalisme Politik Islam di Indonesia.” Universitas Islam Indonesia.
  5. ———. 2016. “Respon Nahdlatul Ulama Terhadap Gagasan Islam Radikal di Indonesia.” Thaqafiyyat 17 (1): 2–17.
  6. ———. 2017. “What is Wrong with Democracy? A View from Hizbut Tahrir.” Transformasi Global 4 (1).
  7. Banaszak, Lee Ann, dan Ondercin Heather. 2010. “Explaining Movement and Countermovement Events in the Contemporary U.S. Women’s Movement.” In the American Political Science Association Meetings. Washington DC. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1668884.
  8. Fealy, Greg. 2007. “Hizbut Tahrir in Indonesia: Seeking A Total Islamic Identity.” In Islam and Political Violence: Muslim Diaspora and Radicalism in the West, diedit oleh Shahram Akbarzadeh dan Fethi Mansouri, 151–64. New York: Tauris Academic Studies.
  9. ———. 2018. “Ma’ruf Amin: Jokowi’s Islamic defender or deadweight?” 2018.
  10. Fealy, Gregory. 2017. “Jokowi’s bungled ban of Hizbut Tahrir.” Lowy Institute. 2017.
  11. Firdaus, Febriana. 2016. “Pesan GP Ansor: Tak ada pemakluman untuk Hizbut Tahrir.” 2016.
  12. Hizb-Indonesia. 2017. “Ustadz Ismail Yusanto: Dakwah Kok Dituduh Makar?” hizb-Indonesia.info. 2017.
  13. Hizb ut-Tahrir. 1999. The Methodology of Hizb ut-Tahrir for Change. London: Al-Khilafah Publications.
  14. ———. 2005. The Institutions of State. London: Al-Khilafah Publications.
  15. Hosen, Nadirsyah. 2018. Islam Yes Khilafah No. Yogyakarta: Suka Press.
  16. Lajnah Tanfidziyah Majelis Mujahidin. 2014. “Pernyataan Majelis Mujahidin: Daulah Al-Baghdadi (ISIS) Rekayasa Syi’ah Menggunakan Doktrin Khawarij.” majelismujahidin. 2014.
  17. Lo, C Y H. 1982. “Countermovements and Conservative Movements in the Contemporary U.S.” Annual Review of Sociology 8 (1). Annual Reviews: 107–34. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.08.080182.000543.
  18. Malik, Shiv. 2004. “For Allah and the Caliphate.” newstateman. 2004.
  19. Mietzner, Marcus. 2018. “Fighting illiberalism with illiberalism: Islamist populism and democratic deconsolidation in Indonesia.” Pacific Affairs 91 (2). Pacific Affairs, a division of the University of British Columbia: 261–82.
  20. Mubarok, Imam. 2016. “Gelar apel siaga, Banser minta polisi bubarkan Muktamar HTI Kediri | merdeka.com.” merdeka.com. 2016.
  21. Muhammadiah. 2017. “Din Syamsuddin: Khilafah Tidak Diabaikan dan Pancasila Tetap Ditegakkan, Begini Solusinya - Berita | Muhammadiyah.” muhammadiah. 2017.
  22. ———. 2018. “Safari Ramadhan ke Australia, Yunahar Ilyas Sampaikan Pandangan Ideologi Muhammadiyah - Berita | Muhammadiyah.” muhammadiah. 2018.
  23. ———. 2019. “Haedar: Muhammadiyah Berpaham Negara Pancasila Darul Ahdi Wasyahadah - Berita | Muhammadiyah.” muhammadiah. 2019.
  24. Muhtadi, Burhanuddin. 2009. “The Quest for Hizbut Tahrir in Indonesia.” Asian Journal of Social Science 37 (4). Brill: 623–45.
  25. Muslimmedianews. 2014. “Pandangan KH. Hasyim Muzadi terhadap Gerakan Khilafah.” 2014.
  26. NU Online. 2007a. “PBNU: Khilafah Islamiyah Celakakan Muslim Minoritas di Negara Lain.” Nu Online. 2007.
  27. ———. 2007b. “PBNU: Konsep Khilafah Islamiyah Tidak Pernah Jelas.” Nu Online. 2007.
  28. ———. 2007c. “Silakan Khilafah, Jangan Bawa Nama NU.” NU Online. 2007.
  29. ———. 2019. “Khilafah dalam Pandangan NU | NU Online.” 2019.
  30. Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiah. 2015. Negara Pancasila Sebagai Darul Ahdi Wa Syahadah. Makassar: Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiah.
  31. Porta, Donatella Della, dan Mario Diani. 2006. Social Movements: An Introduction. Second Edi. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  32. Ramli, Muhammad Idrus. 2013. “Wajibkah Memperjuangkan Khilafah?.” idrusramli. 2013.
  33. Rodhi, Muhammad Muhsin. 2012. “Tsaqofah dan Metode Hizbut Tahrir dalam Mendirikan Negara Khilafah.” Bogor: al-Azhar Fresh Zone Publishing.
  34. Wahid, Abdurrahman. 2011. Islamku, Islam Anda, Islam Kita : Agama Masyarakat Negara Demokrasi, Digital Edition. Jakarta: Democracy Project.
  35. Yusanto, Ismail. 2013. “Capaian Muktamar Khilafah 2013.” hizb-Indonesia. 2013.
  36. Zald, Mayer N, dan Bert Useem. 1982. “Movement and countermovement: Loosely coupled conflict.”

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2020-07-19
Published: 2020-07-30
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: 558 550