The Efforts to Decriminalize Article 549 of the Indonesian Criminal Code from the Perspective of Islamic Criminal Law

Puji Firmansyah* -  UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SUMATERA UTARA, Indonesia
Ramadani Ramadani -  UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SUMATERA UTARA, Indonesia

DOI : 10.30863/ajmpi.v10i1.8236

This study examines the decriminalization of Article 549 of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) from the perspective of Islamic criminal law, focusing on livestock negligence in Sukadame Village, Silangkitang District, South Labuhan Batu Regency. The issue arises from unconfined livestock damaging private land, leading to legal disputes and calls for regulatory reform. This research aims to analyze the necessity of decriminalizing Article 549 KUHP by evaluating its application in local cases and comparing the legal framework of positive law and Islamic law regarding livestock negligence. A qualitative approach with an empirical juridical method was employed, collecting data through interviews with legal practitioners, community leaders, and affected parties, alongside document analysis. The findings indicate that decriminalizing Article 549 KUHP requires legal reform to ensure alignment with current socio-economic conditions. However, prior to implementation, community engagement is crucial to prevent legal uncertainty and unintended consequences. The study suggests that legal adjustments should balance societal needs and legal enforceability, ensuring fairness while maintaining public order. These findings contribute to ongoing discussions on legal reform in Indonesia, particularly in harmonizing statutory law with Islamic legal principles.

Supplement Files

Keywords
Decriminalization; Article 549 KUHP; Islamic Criminal Law;Legal Reform; Livestock Regulation.
  1. A.Barlian, Aristo Evandy, dan Barda Nawawi Arief. “Formulasi Ide Permaafan Hakim (Rechterlijk Pardon) Dalam Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Di Indonesia.” Law Reform 13, no. 1 (2017): 28. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v13i1.15949.
  2. Akbar, Muhammad Fatahillah. “RELEVANSI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DI BIDANG PENGUJIAN UNDANG-UNDANG TERHADAP POLITIK KRIMINAL INDONESIA.” Jurnal Konstitusi 21, no. 3 (1 September 2024): 448–63. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2136.
  3. Biroli, Alfan. “Problematika Penegakkan Hukum di Indonesia (Kajian dengan Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum.” Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi 8, no. 2 (2015): 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21107/djs.v8i2.3728.
  4. Disemadi, Hari Sutra. “Lenses of Legal Research: A Descriptive Essay on Legal Research Methodologies.” Journal of Judicial Review 24, no. 2 (2022): 289. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i2.7280.
  5. Fitri, Sheila Maulida. “Menggagas Konsep Dekriminalisasi Pencemaran Nama Baik Sebagai Pelanggaran Hukum Perdata Murni.” Jurnal Lex Renaissance 5, no. 4 (2020): 792–805. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol5.iss4.art3.
  6. Handoko, Duwi. Dekriminalisasi terhadap Delik-Delik dalam KUHP. Hawa dan Ahwa. Pekanbaru, 2016.
  7. Ibrahim, Duski. AL-QAWA`ID AL-FIQHIYAH (KAIDAH-KAIDAH FIQIH). Noerfikri. Palembang: Noerfikri, 2019.
  8. Irianto, Sulistyowati, Jan Michiel Otto, Sebastian Pompe, Adrian W Bedner, Jacqueline Vel, Suzan Stoter, dan Julia Arnscheidt. Kajian sosio-legal. Seri unsur-unsur penyusun bangunan negara hukum, 2012.
  9. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Biro Hukum dan Humas Badan Urusan Administrasi Mahkamah Agung, n.d.
  10. Nisa, Chairul. “TANGGUNG JAWAB PEMILIK HEWAN TERNAK YANG MENYEBABKAN KERUSAKAN PERKEBUNAN WARGA DITINJAU DARI QANUN GAMPONG BLANG TEUNGOH (Studi Kasus Gampong Blang Teungoh Kecamatan Meukek Aceh Selatan).” UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI AR-RANIRY DARUSSALAM-BANDA ACEH, 2025.
  11. Ramadhani, Ashri. “Jurnal Tamwil : Jurnal Ekonomi Islam.” Jurnal Tamwil: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam 8, no. 2 (2022): 1–9.
  12. Sulaiman, Anwar, dan Asmak Hosnah. “Analisis Penerapan Restorative Justice dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Ringan Sebagai Upaya Mengurangi Over Kapasitas di Lembaga Pemasyarakatan.” internasional journal of socioology, policy and law (IJOSPL) 3, no. 2 (2022): 57–67.
  13. Syarifah, Lailatus. “‘Ibrah dari kisah nabi Sulaiman dalam al-Qur’an di era kontemporer.” Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kediri, 2019.
  14. Tarigan, Maria Isabel, dan Josua Satria Collins. “Dekriminalisasi Penggunaan Ganja: Pendekatan Komparatif California’s Adult Use of Marijuana Act Maria.” Padjadjaran Law Review 7, no. 1 (2019): 22.
  15. Ulfa, Widia. “DEKRIMINALISASI TERHADAP PASAL 127 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA.” RIO LAW JURNAL 1, no. 1 (29 Februari 2020). https://doi.org/10.36355/rlj.v1i1.330.
  16. Unlu, Ali, Tuukka Tammi, dan Pekka Hakkarainen. Drug Decriminalization Policy Literature Review : Models , Implementation and Outcomes. Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL). Helsinki, Finland: Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), 2020.
  17. Woods, Jordan Blair. “Decriminalization, police authority, and routine traffic stops.” UCLA Law Review 62, no. 3 (2015): 672–759.

Full Text: Supp. File(s):
Hasil Turnitin
Subject
Type Research Instrument
  Download (2MB)    Indexing metadata
Article Info
Submitted: 2025-01-01
Published: 2025-02-04
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: 68 35