KONSTITUSIONALITAS HAK ANGKET DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT (DPR) TERHADAP KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI (KPK)

Ismail Aris* -  SEKOLAH TINGGI AGAMA ISLAM AL-GHAZALI BONE
Irfan Amir -  INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM NEGERI (IAIN) BONE
Septian Amrianto -  Prodi Hukum Tata Negara IAIN Bone

DOI : 10.35673/ajmpi.v4i2.436

The development of the state institutional theory requires that it no longer seals every State institution only to depend on 3 (three) branches of power as the teaching of the new separation of power theory. On the other hand, the decision of the Constitutional Court and the Revision of the KPK Law are placed as executive institutions. So it is debated whether the KPK is a subject that can be rounded up, because it is an executive institution or the KPK cannot be made a subject of questionnaire rights because of its position as an independent agency agency? This study aims to determine and analyze the authority of the DPR's questionnaire rights to the KPK and the constitutionality of the DPR's Questionnaire Rights to the KPK Perspectives on the revision of the KPK Law and Comparison in Various Countries. This type of research is the type of normative legal research. The approach used is the legislation approach and comparative law (comparison approach), the philosophical approach to the law (philosophical approach).

The results of the study showed that the constitutionality of the DPR questionnaire rights was based on the original intent of the questionnaire right norm in a comprehensive draft amendment to the Basic Law, the questionnaire right was only aimed at state institutions of the executive family. In addition, Constitutional Court Decision No. 36-40 / PUU-XV / 2017, which categorizes the Corruption Eradication Commission as a group of executive institutions is in conflict with other Constitutional Court decisions, namely Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 012-016-019 / PUU-IV / 2006, 19 / PUU-V / 2007, 37-39 / PUU-VIII / 2010. 5 / PUU-IX / 2011, places the KPK as an independent agency and is categorized as faste jurisprudence (permanent jurisprudence). In addition, theoretically, the teaching of the new theory of separation of power teaches that it is no longer appropriate to place State institutions based only on 3 (three) branches of power. While the constitutionality of the DPR's questionnaire rights to the KPK Perspective of the revision of the KPK Law and Comparison in Various Countries is based on the results of research by researchers that the KPK's position in various countries is independent or dependent. For example, in South Africa, Zimbabwe, Egypt and Thailand. Likewise with the subject of state institutions that can be researched, there are no countries that address the right of questionnaires to these independent institutions. For example, the United States of America, Philippines, South Africa, all of whom address the questioning right of inquiry only as an executive state institution.

  1. Buku-buku
  2. Ashiddiqie, Jimly, 2006, Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, Jakarta,
  3. Dhesinta, Wafia Slivi, 2017, “Politik Hukum Pengaturan Hak Angket dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Di Indonesia”, dalam Pro Kontra Hak Angket KPK: Bunga Rampai Pemikiran Dalam Diskusi Akademik Nasional Di Fakultas Hukum Universitas Surabaya, Laboratorium Hukum Administrasi Negara Fakultas Hukum Universitas Surabaya.
  4. Indrayana, Denny, 2016, Jangan Bunuh KPK, Intrans Publishing, Malang .
  5. Mahkamah Konstitusi RI, 2010, Naskah Komprehensif Perubahan UUD Negara RI Indonesia Tahun 1945; Latar Belakang, Proses, dan Hasil Pembahasan 1999-2002, Buku Ke III, Jilid 2, Sekretariat Jenderal MKRI, Jakarta.
  6. S.S.T, Arifin, 1998. Fungsi Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Menurut UUD 1945, Suatu Studi Analisis Mengenai Pengaturannya Tahun 1966-1997. Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Militer. Jakarta
  7. Yamamoto, Hiromori, 2007, Tools For Parliamentary Oversight A Comparative Study of 88 National Parliaments, Inter-Parliamentary Union, Switzerland, .Avalaible at http://archive.ipu.org/PDF/publications/oversight08-e.pdf.
  8. Jurnal
  9. Ackerman, Bruce, “The New Separation of Powers”, Harvard Law Review Vol. 113, Januari 2000.
  10. Aris, Ismail, “Kedudukan KPK dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan dalam Perspektif Teori The New Separation Of Power, (Kritik atas Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 36/PUU-XV/2017 dan No. 40/PUU-XV/2017)”, Jurnal Jurisprudentie, Vol. 5 No. 2 Juni 2018.
  11. Bima, Muhammad Rinaldy, et al., “Legitimasi Hak Angket Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Terhadap Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi”, Jurnal Kertha Patrika, Vol. 41, No. 1, April 2019.
  12. Isra, Saldi, “Hubungan Presiden dan DPR”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 10, No. 3, September 2013.
  13. Mantel, Matthew, “Congressional Investigations: A Bibliography”, Law Library Journal, Vol. 100 (2), 2008. https://www.academia.edu/7346149/ Congressional _Investigations_A_Bibliography.
  14. Novianti, “Implikasi Putusan MK Atas Penggunaan Hak Angket DPR Terhadap KPK”, Info Singkat, Vol. 10, No. 4, Februari 2018.
  15. Skach, Cindy, The “newest ” Separation of Powers: Emipresidentialism, Journal I-CON, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2007.
  16. Subardjo, “Penggunaan Hak Angket Oleh DPR RI dalam Mengawasi Kebijakan Pemerintah”, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Novelty, Vol. 7, No. 1, Februari 2016.
  17. Sunarto, “Pelaksanaan Fungsi Pengawasan DPR (Perbandingan antara Era Orde Baru dan Era Reformasi)”, Integralistik, No. 1, 2018.
  18. Susanto, Mei “Hak Angket DPR, KPK dan Pemberantasan Korupsi”, Integritas, Vol. 4, No. 2, Desember 2018.
  19. Weruin, Urbanus Ura, “Logika, Penalaran, dan Argumentasi Hukum”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 14, No. 2, Juni 2017.
  20. Peraturan Perundang-undangan dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi
  21. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
  22. Konstirusi Republik Indonesia Serikat Tahun 1949
  23. Undang-Undang Dasar Sementara Tahun 1950.
  24. Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1950 tentang Perubahan Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Serikat Menjadi Undang-Undang Dasar Sementara Republik Indonesia.
  25. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 1985 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 1969 Tentang Susunan dan Kedudukan MPR, DPR, DPD, dan DPRD Sebagaimana Telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1975. (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1987 Nomor 2, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 3282)
  26. Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. (Lembaran Negera Republik Indonesia Tahun 2002 Nomor 137, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4250)
  27. Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2003 tentang Susunan dan Kedudukan MPR, DPR, DPD, dan DPRD. (Lembaran Negera Republik Indonesia Tahun 2003 Nomor 92, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4310)
  28. Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2009 tentang MPR, DPR, DPD, dan DPRD. (Lembaran Negera Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 123, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5043)
  29. Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 tentang MPR, DPR, DPD, dan DPRD. (Lembaran Negera Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 182, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5568)
  30. Putusan Mahkmah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 36/PUU-XV/2017 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang No. 17 Tahun 2014 tentang MPR, DPR, DPD, dan DPRD terhadap UUD NRI 1945.
  31. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia Nomor 40/PUU-XV/2017 Tentang Pengujian Undang-Undang No. 17 Tahun 2014 tentang MPR, DPR, DPD, dan DPRD terhadap UUD NRI 1945.
  32. Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang telah disetujui serta belum disahkan dan dibukukan ke lembaran negara.
  33. Peraturan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 Tentang Tata Tertib
  34. Konstitusi di berbagai Negara dan dokumen lainnya
  35. Constitution of The Republic of South Africa No. 108 of 1996. Avalaible at https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/images/a108-96.pdf. Diakses pada tanggal 2 Oktober 2019.
  36. Egypt's Constitution of 2014. Avalaible at https://www.constituteproject.org/ constitution/Egypt_2014.pdf. diakses pada tanggal 2 Oktober 2019.
  37. Thailand's Constitution of 2014, constituteproject.org. Diakses pada tanggal 22 Februari 2018.
  38. The 1987 Constitution of The Republic of The Philippines Vide, https://www. parliament.gov.za/what-parliament-does
  39. United States of America's Constitution of 1789 with Amendments through 1992. Avalaible at https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/United_States of_America_1992.pdf?lang=en. Diakses pada tanggal 2 Oktober 2019
  40. Zimbabwe's Constitution of 2013. Avalaible at https://www.constituteproject.org/ constitution/Zimbabwe_2013.pdf. Diakses pada tanggal 2 Oktober 2019
  41. Website
  42. https://acch.kpk.go.id/id/statistik/tindak-pidana-korupsi/tpk-berdasarkan-profesi-jabatan.
  43. https://www.parliament.gov.za/what-parliament-does
  44. UNCAC Coalition, UNCAC Coalition Statement on threats to the independence of Indonesia’s Corruption Eradication Commission KPK, 27.09.2019. https://uncaccoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/Indonesia-statement-on-KPK-%E2%80%93-27092019.pdf

Full Text:
Article Info
Submitted: 2019-08-31
Published: 2019-10-10
Section: Artikel
Article Statistics: 814 988
In Vol 4, No 2 (2019)